It was a not a bit frustrating to issue the press release below, whose headline was the headline of this posting. The BCCLA worked hard to try to recover the alleged video from Adam’s cell phone, and in the process realized that the state of technology for data recovery from cell phones could generously be described as, ahem, primitive.

Beyond the issues listed in the press release, this situation underlines the challenges of our front line work. As a lawyer at the Department of Justice, on accepting my job at Pivot, I was taken aside by a senior lawyer who advised me: “Never trust anyone.” He was suggesting that, as an advocate, and a lawyer, that I take my clients’ versions of events with a grain of salt and not invest personal credibility in something they told me happened. It was generally good advice, if a bit cynical.

At the BCCLA, at some point, we need to place some trust in the people who come forward with what might, at first glance, appear to be outrageous allegations. “I was taken to Stanley Park and beaten up by six police officers,” or “I was put in a bunny suit and made to pose for trophy photographs by police officers in the jail,” and “I was beaten up and robbed by three off duty police officers who told me not to call 911 because they were the police,” are all examples of events, validated by video, photographs or police witnesses, that might otherwise have been ignored or dismissed as too bizarre to be true.

What are we to do with allegations not supported by these kinds of incontrovertible evidence? Allegations that have the ring of truth, that are consistent with other concerns we have heard from other people?

The BCCLA’s role is to vet complaints as best we can and take them forward to the public when necessary to raise broader issues of public policy. While, unfortunately, we may never know conclusively whether or not Adam’s video ever existed, we were able to change VPD policy on handling cameras in the possession of the media or the public, giving the BCCLA yet another reason to trust again when someone comes forward asking for help.

Incidentally, members and supporters may be interested to know that the actual cash cost of the recovery effort was paid for by two media outlets.

————-

Two months of effort by three different data recovery companies to recover an allegedly deleted cell phone video of a police shooting has ended in a frustratingly inconclusive result for the BC Civil Liberties Association. The data recovery companies have not been able to recover any part of the video or even say, one way or another, whether the video ever existed.

On March 20, 2009, Michael Hubbard was shot and killed by police after being mistaken for a petty thief. Adam Smolcic, a bystander who says he filmed the incident on his cell phone, claims that shortly thereafter a VPD officer confiscated his phone and deleted the video he had just taken.

In the end, the BCCLA did not have the resources to initiate further attempts to recover Mr. Smolcic’s video.  The next level of data recovery that involves disassembling the phone would cost thousands of dollars.  Neverthelles, there is still opportunity for transparency and openness, and the BCCLA called on the VPD and Abbotsford Police who is investigating the shooting to release surveillance video of the shooting to the public, or at the very least to the family of Mr. Hubbard.

Last month, VPD Chief Jim Chu wrote a memo to all VPD officers and civilian staff in which he suggested that security camera footage showed Hubbard advancing on the officers. Some early witness accounts suggested Hubbard was standing still when police opened fire.

Mr. Smolcic’s allegation, coupled with an allegation made by a Vancouver Province photographer, caused the VPD to change their policy on seizing cameras from members of the public and the media.

The BCCLA will be returning the cell phone to Mr. Smolcic. The total cost of the data recovery effort was slightly in excess of $750 USD. The BCCLA’s data recovery attempts were greatly assisted by Simon Feay of Aceon Data Recovery, a Vancouver-based data recovery firm.

This week’s death of Sam George is a grim reminder of the tragic death of his brother, Dudley George.  In 1995, Dudley George was shot during a protest by Ontario Provincial Police officer Sgt. Kenneth Deane.  Dudley George was unarmed.  Sgt. Deane was convicted two years later of criminal negligence causing death.

After the death of his brother, Sam George pushed for a public inquiry.  Dalton McGuinty made the inquiry an election promise in 2003.  The inquiry was called one month after the election, and Commissioner Sidney B. Linden’s report was released May 31, 2007.  The Ipperwash Inquiry found that the OPP, the government of former Ontario premier Mike Harris and the federal government all bore responsibility for Dudley George’s death. Premier Harris, in particular, was instrumental in creating an antagonistic atmosphere and ruling out a peaceful end to the occupation favoured by the OPP and civil servants.

Sam George led a distinguished life advocating for the rights of Aboriginal peoples and working to improve relations between Aboriginals, Metis and non-aboriginals in Canada.

Check out the article on Sam George in The Province and CBC’s article on the Ipperwash Inquiry.

Commissioner William Elliott yesterday offered his apology for Robert Dziekanski’s death on behalf of the RCMP.  The apology comes more than a year and a half after Mr. Dziekanski’s death in custody.

Along with an apology, Elliott addressed BC’s order to the RCMP to pull the old M-26 Taser model from service after tests have shown them to be unreliable.  The failure rate is approximately 80%.  Elliott responded by recalling all M-26 models across Canada, which amounts to approximately 1500 units.  The models will be put back in service when they are independently tested, repaired and retested.

The BC Civil Liberties Association has called for a moratorium on Taser use until all in-service units have been independently tested for safety and reliability and national policy has been developed on their use.

Check out the story in The Province.

Today, the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP (CPC) released its final report on the in-custody death of Kevin St. Arnaud.  The report clears the officer involved, but offers sharp criticism of the RCMP internal investigation.  The investigation took four and a half years.

The death of Kevin St. Arnaud is a shining example of why the police should not investigate themselves when it comes to in-custody deaths or serious injuries. A witness stated at the coroner’s inquest that Mr. St. Arnaud put his hands up and surrendered to RCMP constable Ryan Sheremetta. Constable Sheremetta’s account was found to be inconsistent with ballistics evidence, forensics experts and another RCMP officer who witnessed the shooting. And yet, the Chair of the CPC, Paul Kennedy, has decided that Sheremetta acted in self defence.The  investigation that assessed Constable Sheremetta’s actions is, according to Kennedy, “inadequate” and “lacking impartiality”.  The RCMP have accepted this finding.

Whether it be Mr. St. Arnaud, Ian Bush, Robert Dziekanski or the countless others that have died in police custody, the public is never going to have confidence in an internal investigation. These investigations need to be done by a civilian investigation team like Ontario’s Special Investigations Unit (SIU) or similar agency. The usual argument against such a change is that police agencies are capable of impartial and unbiased investigations, an argument dismissed in jurisdictions like England and Ontario, among others, as well as by William H. Davies, Commissioner of the Frank Paul Inquiry.  Many also argue that only the police have the skills to investigate these matters.  This argument has also been dismissed, for example, by Andre Marin, Ombudsman of Ontario and former head of the Special Investigations Unit in Ontario.

The BCCLA has pushed for an SIU in BC for years, and we’ve been joined by numerous others: William H. Davies, Andre Marin, Linda Bush (Ian Bush’s mother), Cameron Ward (a Vancouver lawyer who has represented a number of families whose relatives died in police custody including the families of Kevin St. Arnaud, Kyle Tait and  Donald Lewis), and countless other individuals and community organisations.  Manitoba recently made a decision to create an SIU, which shows that change can happen.

Watch the CBC’s report.

Cameron Ward has written on his blog about the findings of the Coroner’s inquest.

Police psychologist Mike Webster today sent an open letter to the mother of Robert Dziekanski, offering what he says “is probably as close as you will come to a genuine apology from the RCMP.”   Dr. Webster had his contract work cancelled by the RCMP after openly criticising the force last year with regard to the in-custody death of Robert Dziekanski. Zofia Cisowski responded to the letter by stating “nobody so far exposed the truth about the RCMP as Dr. Webster did.”

The letter is printed below in its entirety, and the discussion of slash gloves is particularly interesting. Below are  a few of the more scathing criticisms Dr. Webster leveled at the RCMP:

An inept, insular and archaic group of RCMP executives has let the Force fall out of step with 21st Century policing.

The idea of intimidating people is entirely consistent with the RCMP management’s way of managing conflict not only with the public but also with its own membership.

[The RCMP executive] view themselves as somehow apart from the rest of us, an elite group whose safety is more important than that of the most unfortunate among us.

We have become the `enemy’ and they go to `war’ with us each day, rather than collaborating with us to form a cohesive and consistent approach to policing our communities.

Unfortunately, the long history and rich tradition of the Force manifests itself today as arrogance and defensiveness.

The RCMP is in need of significant transformational change in order to genuinely reconnect with the public and its own membership.

(more…)

RCMP media spokespersons Cpl. Dale Carr and Sgt. Pierre Lemaitre will be testifying at the Braidwod Inquiry. The BCCLA filed a police complaint over public statements made by the two officers in the days following the in-custody death of Robert Dziekanski. The complaint alleges that the two RCMP officers misrepresented facts and engaged in character attacks against Robert Dziekanski and Paul Pritchard. The complaint also alleges that the RCMP attempted to suppress the video footage recorded by Mr. Pritchard.

The investigation of the complaint has already been completed, but the BCCLA has argued that the investigation is woefully inadequate and recently filed a Request for Review with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP. While we’re waiting to see if we can get an adequate investigation, let’s hope that Commissioner Braidwood can get some answers from the RCMP.

Check out the BCCLA original complaint, the investigation report, the request for review, and an article in the Vancouver Sun.

The BCCLA is represented by BCCLA Litigation Director Grace Pastine and BCCLA Articled Student Sara Dubinsky at the Braidwood Inquiry.