Thomas Braidwood has released his report on the public inquiry probing the police use of tasers. Braidwood concluded that tasers are useful and beneficial, but can cause death and serious injury. This finding prompted his recommendation that the police should deploy a taser only when someone is causing bodily harm or there is reasonable belief that someone will imminently cause bodily harm. Braidwood’s 19 recommendations are reproduced below.

Immediately following the release of the report, BC Solicitor General Kash Heed praised the report as “perhaps the most comprehensive examination of (tasers) anywhere in the world” and ordered all police, sheriffs and corrections officers in BC to incorporate Braidwood’s recommendations into policy and “severely restrict the use of the stun guns.” In contrast, the RCMP released a statement that effectively said the RCMP will not comply with Braidwood’s recommendations, supposedly until they have had full opportunity to review the report. This recalcitrance prompted a sharp rebuke, with Mr. Heed stating that compliance is required from all police in BC, which includes the RCMP, and that compliance was a precondition for the renewal of the RCMP’s contract in BC which ends in 2012.

Kash Heed deserves credit for asserting his authority and ensuring that the RCMP is held accountable to our provincial government and the citizens it serves. His position is unequivocal and uncompromising, stating “I am quite confident those organizations will follow the directive that was received today. I expect it to be followed.” RCMP officers are now forced to choose between following the directive issued by Heed, or flaunting the findings and recommendations of an independent provincial inquiry. Let us hope that a wave of cautious pragmatism moves through the ranks that Creditable Conduleads to compliance.

Braidwood is critical of the provincial government for “abdicating” its responsibility to establish taser standards to ensure the weapon was safe for use and used safely. While the province’s responsiveness today is praiseworthy, we must not forget that it was preceded by years of inaction and avoidance.

The Braidwood Inquiry into the death of Robert Dziekanski is apparently expecting huge new volumes of RCMP document disclosure, despite the fact that the Inquiry has been underway for almost a year, and closing submissions had been scheduled to take place last month.

As you may recall, closing submissions were delayed when counsel for the RCMP found a missing CD-ROM that contained an e-mail that suggested some testimony given by the RCMP officers involved was incorrect.

As the job posting describes, the Commission apparently expects that there may be thousands of additional documents disclosed to the Commissioner by the RCMP; documents that arguably should have been in the hands of the Commissioner a long, long time ago. The job description offers no explanation why the RCMP are only disclosing these documents now.

Job Posting at the Braidwood Commissions of Inquiry

To apply, send your resume and cover letter via email only by Friday, July 17, 2009 to:
Cathy Stooshnov, Manager, Finance & Administration cathy.stooshnov@braidwoodinquiry.ca

The details of the position are below:
(more…)

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Constables Bill Bentley and Kwesi Millington have appealed the BC Supreme Court ruling that Commissioner Braidwood has authority to make findings of fault.  The appeal also seeks to prevent the Commission from continuing proceedings against the two officers until 60 days after the BC Court of Appeal rules on the matter.

The Braidwood Inquiry, which is investigating the death of Robert Dziekanski, was set to conclude until an internal RCMP email surfaced that appears to contradict sworn testimony.  Unless further delayed, the inquiry will resume on September 22.

Check out the story in the Vancouver Sun.

The Braidwood inquiry was thrown into an uproar today after a Department of Justice lawyer representing the RCMP made a late disclosure of an email exchange between two senior RCMP officers just as closing submissions were about to begin. The BCCLA is a participant at the inquiry.

The email was an exchange between the two most senior officers in the “E Division” of the RCMP, and suggests that the four RCMP officers went into the airport planning to taser Mr. Dziekanski before they even saw him. At the inquiry, the four officers denied that they had discussed a plan in advance of arriving at the airport.

The email, however, suggests that one or more of the officers told their superiors around the time of the incident the exact opposite. Further, the email suggests that they contemplated using the taser not in accordance with RCMP policy and training.

The e-mail from Supt. Dick Bent to RCMP Assistant Commissioner Al Macintyre, dated Nov. 5, 2007, said: “Finally, spoke to Wayne [Rideout] and he indicated that the members did not articulate that they saw the symptoms of excited delirium, but instead had discussed the response en route and decided that if he did not comply that they would go to CEW (conducted energy weapon).”

The issues raised by the email are highly relevant and go to the very core of the inquiry’s mandate. The public deserves a full explanation of the email’s contents and its drafting, and significantly, why it wasn’t disclosed many months ago. Further, the public’s confidence in the RCMP has been shaken and we need assurances that the RCMP is disclosing all relevant materials.

Inquiry Commissioner Thomas Braidwood said that he was “appalled” that the RCMP had not disclosed the information months ago, and ordered that the inquiry be postponed so that the contents of the email could be investigated. He stated that further evidentiary hearings may be required.

Commission counsel Art Vertlieb, who outlined the e-mail suggested that it may be necessary to recall the four officers to testify again. The senior RCMP officers involved in the email exchange likely will have to testify as well. The e-mail, written on Nov. 5, 2007, was disclosed only this week by the federal Justice Department to commission counsel.

The late disclosure of this document has disrupted months of work. We’re shocked that the email wasn’t disclosed to the commission and participants months ago, and call upon the RCMP to provide the public with complete assurances that full disclosure has been made. The public has the right to know why the RCMP did not disclose the email until after the four officers testified.

greybar

Grace Pastine is the Litigation Director and is counsel for the BC Civil Liberties Association at the Braidwood Inquiry

 

The transcript of the email as read at the inquiry is below.
(more…)

Four of the RCMP officers under scrutiny at the public inquiry into the death of Robert Dziekanski have failed in their attempts to prevent retired judge Thomas Braidwood from releasing his report.  The officers alleged that Commissioner Braidwood did not have the authority to cast blame.

Arne Silverman, a judge of the B.C. Supreme Court, found that Justice Braidwood had treated the officers fairly during the proceedings and, according to the BC Public Inquiry Act, has the authority to make findings of misconduct.

Check out the article in the Vancouver Sun.

The four RCMP officers involved in the in-custody death of Robert Dziekanski are in BC Supreme Court in order to prevent Commissioner Braidwood from potentially making findings of professional misconduct.  Commissioner Braidwood has advised each of the officers of the allegations on which he will make a determination. For example, Gerry Rundel has been advised that the following will be assessed:

Check out the CBC story for more details.

Update: 10.06.2009

Check out the court documents the RCMP filed.

RCMP media spokespersons Cpl. Dale Carr and Sgt. Pierre Lemaitre will be testifying at the Braidwod Inquiry. The BCCLA filed a police complaint over public statements made by the two officers in the days following the in-custody death of Robert Dziekanski. The complaint alleges that the two RCMP officers misrepresented facts and engaged in character attacks against Robert Dziekanski and Paul Pritchard. The complaint also alleges that the RCMP attempted to suppress the video footage recorded by Mr. Pritchard.

The investigation of the complaint has already been completed, but the BCCLA has argued that the investigation is woefully inadequate and recently filed a Request for Review with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP. While we’re waiting to see if we can get an adequate investigation, let’s hope that Commissioner Braidwood can get some answers from the RCMP.

Check out the BCCLA original complaint, the investigation report, the request for review, and an article in the Vancouver Sun.

The BCCLA is represented by BCCLA Litigation Director Grace Pastine and BCCLA Articled Student Sara Dubinsky at the Braidwood Inquiry.